CLPwatch Austral Dutch Kaolin Pty Ltd v Hanjin PandC Co Ltd[removed]FCA[removed]June[removed]Background The respondent seeks access to communications between the applicant and its solicitor, - Dutch law - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	CLPwatch Austral Dutch Kaolin Pty Ltd v Hanjin PandC Co Ltd[removed]FCA[removed]June[removed]Background The respondent seeks access to communications between the applicant and its solicitor, Add to Reading List Document Date: 2013-06-16 22:53:48 Open Document File Size: 67,36 KB Share Result on Facebook Company B T Australasia Pty Ltd / Hanjin PandC Co Ltd / Telstra Corporation Ltd / CLPwatch Austral Dutch Kaolin Pty Ltd / / Country Australia / / Currency USD / / IndustryTerm important common law / / Organization Court of Appeal / Department of Justice / UN Court / Law Council of Australia / / Person Bert Stahr / William Hayes / Michael O'Brien / / Position director of the applicant / co-director / Governor / solicitor / Secretary / director / lawyer / / URL www.lawcouncil.asn.au/sections/federal-litigation/clpwatch / / SocialTag Legal professional privilege in England and Wales Legal professional privilege Privilege Confidentiality Lawyer Affidavit Law Attorney-client privilege Legal professional privilege in Australia

CLPwatch Austral Dutch Kaolin Pty Ltd v Hanjin PandC Co Ltd[removed]FCA[removed]June[removed]Background The respondent seeks access to communications between the applicant and its solicitor,Add to Reading List