Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Privileged communication / Jaffee v. Redmond / Tort law / Duty to warn / Involuntary commitment / Federal Rules of Evidence / Privilege / Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California / Law / Mental health law / Medical ethics


Law & Psychiatry Privilege in the Federal Courts: Should There Be a “Dangerous Patient Exception”? Paul S. Appelbaum, M.D.
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2008-10-18 13:01:38


Open Document

File Size: 63,00 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

New York City / /

Company

New England Law Review / /

Country

United States / /

/

Event

Judicial Event / /

Facility

Ninth Circuit Court / New York State Psychiatric Institute / Columbia University / /

IndustryTerm

state law / federal commitment law / law enforcement / /

MedicalCondition

personality disorders / /

MedicalTreatment

psychotherapy / /

Organization

Department of Psychiatry / Congress / Columbia University / Circuit court / U.S. Supreme Court / Ninth Circuit Court / American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law / New York State Psychiatric Institute / Harvard / Secret Service / Federal Bureau of Investigation / /

Person

Bill Clinton / Glass / Stevens / Paul S. Appelbaum / /

Position

therapist / psychiatrist / editor / President / commentator / treating social worker / Professor of Psychiatry / Medicine and Law / /

ProvinceOrState

California / /

PublishedMedium

Harvard Law Review / New England Law Review / American Journal of Psychiatry / /

SocialTag