High Court / University of Technology / Kangaroo Think Tank University of Technology / /
IndustryTerm
greenhouse gas emissions / kangaroo products / social systems / kangaroo management / food safety / animal welfare law / particular product / by‐product / environmental law expert / pet food / food and other products / leather products / meat processing plants / /
NaturalFeature
Murray / /
Organization
National Health and Medical Research Council / federal government / Department of Environment Water Heritage and Climate Change / Department of Agriculture Fisheries / Research Advisory Committee / Institute for Sustainable Futures / High Court of Australia / World Society for the Protection of Animals / Sherman Foundation / University of Technology / Sydney / Department of the Treasury / Kangaroo Think Tank University / /
Person
David Croft / Keely Boom / Kenneth R. Henry / Bidda Jones / Daniel Ramp / Max Dulumunmun Harrison / Louise Boronyak / Christine Townend / Dror Ben / Stuart White / Daniel May / Jessica Borg / pioneering animal welfare expert Christine Townend / /
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF COMMERCIAL KANGAROO HARVESTING: DO THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS