Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Rural society in China / Lhasa / Standard Tibetan / Geography of Tibet / Asia / Tibet


Property Relations in Tibet Since Decollectivisation and the Question of Fuzziness Emily T. Yeh Property relations in contemporary Tibet are often ambiguous. Their ‘fuzziness’ has origins in both the legacy of post-soc
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2004-06-11 21:12:16


Open Document

File Size: 217,15 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Lhasa / New Delhi / Kyichuling / Beijing / London / /

Company

Bernstein / /

Country

Romania / Hungary / United States / Vietnam / China / Tibet / /

Currency

CNY / USD / /

/

Event

Person Travel / Diplomatic Relations / /

IndustryTerm

payment systems / food / chemical fertilisers / agricultural chemicals / law states / martial law / responsibility systems / real estate office / /

Organization

Lhasa Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Department / Department of Geography / People’s Liberation Army / Tibetan government / World Food Programme / World Bank / Lhasa municipal government / Communist Party / TAR government / Chinese government / /

Person

Jennifer Sokolove / Lin / Janet Sturgeon / Thomas Gold / Emily T. Yeh / Jennifer Sowerwine / Amy Hanser / Ken Foster / Carsten Vala / Katherine Verdery / Thomas Sikor / Eileen Otis / Peter Ho / Carol Rose / /

Position

politics teacher / scientist / secretary / township leader / village leader / county official / /

ProvinceOrState

Dulong / Nagchu / Anhui / Shuanghu / Yunnan / Sichuan / /

Region

eastern China / Eastern Europe / /

SocialTag