QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an administrative agency, when authorized by Congress to regulate only if “appropriate,” can deem the cost of the regulation irrelevant, with the result that, by the agency’s own estimat

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-11-18 16:05:00 United States Environmental Protection Agency Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency Case law Law Government Laurence Tribe Entergy Entergy v. Riverkeeper Coal		QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an administrative agency, when authorized by Congress to regulate only if “appropriate,” can deem the cost of the regulation irrelevant, with the result that, by the agency’s own estimat Add to Reading List Source URL: sblog.s3.amazonaws.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 1,09 MB Share Document on Facebook

	Forty Years of Supreme Court Jurisprudence on the Clean Water Act: Judicial Aggression and Congressional Apathy Toward the Nation’s Waters Sandra Zellmer Robert B. Daugherty Professor University of Nebraska College of DocID: 1qoLi - View Document
	14-46 Michigan v. EPA) DocID: 1jXjG - View Document
	Proposed Rule Broadens Clean Water Act... Preserves Exemptions for Boaters The Obama administration recently unveiled a regulatory proposal that would bring nearly all rivers, streams and creeks under the protection of t DocID: 19BQb - View Document
	Nos, 14-47, 14-49 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States DocID: 185zU - View Document
	Female worker at printing plant DocID: 17AQH - View Document