Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Crime / Criminology / Economics / Essential facilities doctrine / Refusal / United States antitrust law / Monopoly / Anti-competitive practices / Competition law / Law / Anti-competitive behaviour


Report on the Analysis of Refusal to Deal with a Rival Under Unilateral Conduct Laws Prepared by The Unilateral Conduct Working Group
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2012-11-14 13:05:47


Open Document

File Size: 297,81 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Commission / Jersey / /

Company

ICN Unilateral Conduct Working Group / ENFORCEMENT EXPERIENCE / State-Created Monopolies / LEGAL BASIS / REGULATED INDUSTRIES / D. REMEDIES IN REGULATED INDUSTRIES / Penal Code / State-Created Monopolies Several / ENFORCEMENT EXPERIENCE A. GENERAL VERSUS SPECIFIC / Intellectual Property / /

Country

Taiwan / Germany / Switzerland / Romania / Hungary / Netherlands / Italy / Estonia / Bulgaria / Mexico / Serbia / Sweden / South Africa / New Zealand / Chile / Honduras / Poland / Colombia / Indonesia / Belgium / Turkey / France / Japan / Russia / Pakistan / Jordan / El Salvador / United States / Canada / Slovakia / Korea / United Kingdom / Singapore / Lithuania / Israel / Finland / Spain / Costa Rica / Ireland / Denmark / Czech Republic / /

Facility

EVALUATION OF AN ESSENTIAL FACILITY / Max Planck Institute / /

IndustryTerm

product / case law / competition law provisions / competition law / criminal law / competition law violation / /

Organization

Federal Competition Commission of Mexico / Turkish Competition Authority / Max Planck Institute / JFTC / Italian Competition Authority / New Zealand Commerce Commission / European Commission / Irish Competition Authority / European Union / Competition Commission of Singapore / Relevance of History of Dealing No / /

Person

Drexl / /

Position

PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT / agencies and non-governmental advisors / A. GENERAL / Executive / /

PublishedMedium

Seventeen / /

URL

http /

SocialTag