<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Economics / Financial transaction tax / Political economy / Internal Market / European Union law / Tax / Treaties of the European Union / Value added tax / European Union / Taxation / International taxation / Public economics
Date: 2012-10-25 10:11:14
Economics
Financial transaction tax
Political economy
Internal Market
European Union law
Tax
Treaties of the European Union
Value added tax
European Union
Taxation
International taxation
Public economics

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, [removed]COM[removed]final[removed]APP)

Add to Reading List

Source URL: ec.europa.eu

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 81,63 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Grounds of Appeal to the Supreme Court of the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 1. The Divisional Court erred in ruling that the Crown has no legal power to commence a withdrawal from the EU Treaties by g

Grounds of Appeal to the Supreme Court of the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 1. The Divisional Court erred in ruling that the Crown has no legal power to commence a withdrawal from the EU Treaties by g

DocID: 1tq8t - View Document

CL1962R0031EN0130020.0001.3bi_cp 1..5

CL1962R0031EN0130020.0001.3bi_cp 1..5

DocID: 1rric - View Document

European ParliamentCommittee on Economic and Monetary AffairsCOD)

European ParliamentCommittee on Economic and Monetary AffairsCOD)

DocID: 1roBI - View Document

A6http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A6+0... Procedure : COD)

A6http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A6+0... Procedure : COD)

DocID: 1rkpZ - View Document

Groen, L. and Niemann, A) ‘The European Union at the Copenhagen Climate Negotations: A Case of Contested EU Actorness and Effectiveness’ In: International Relations, Vol. 27. No. 3, pp.

Groen, L. and Niemann, A) ‘The European Union at the Copenhagen Climate Negotations: A Case of Contested EU Actorness and Effectiveness’ In: International Relations, Vol. 27. No. 3, pp.

DocID: 1riQm - View Document