Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Waste / Environmental soil science / Environmental engineering / Food waste / Municipal solid waste / Garbage disposal unit / Compost / Sanitation / Incineration / Environment / Waste management / Sewerage


A BRIEF SUMMARY AND INTERPRETATION OF KEY POINTS, FACTS, AND CONCLUSIONS FOR University of Wisconsin Study: “LIFE CYCLE COMPARISON OF FIVE ENGINEERED
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2008-09-24 09:25:02


Open Document

File Size: 36,99 KB

Share Result on Facebook

Company

FIVE FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS / Is incorporated / /

Country

United States / /

Currency

USD / /

Event

Environmental Issue / /

Facility

AND CONCLUSIONS FOR University of Wisconsin Study / /

IndustryTerm

food waste disposer / metal / Typical food waste / food waste disposers / electricity / non-edible food / food waste results / low quality product / household food waste / high water content food / net energy gain / treatment systems / food carbon / waste-to-energy facility / methane gas / putrescible food waste / municipal collection systems / non-edible food waste / food waste nutrients / system energy / operational systems / food waste systems / food waste / food waste disposer processing food waste / food / energy / /

Organization

Milwaukee School of Engineering in Milwaukee / AND CONCLUSIONS FOR University of Wisconsin Study / Civil and Environmental Engineering Department / National Association of Heating / Civil Engineering Department / University of Wisconsin / /

Person

Carol Diggelman / Robert Ham / WILLIAM F. STRUTZ / /

Position

Professor / Executive / ENGINEER / /

ProgrammingLanguage

Joule / /

ProvinceOrState

Wisconsin / /

Technology

wastewater treatment / Composting / Environmental Engineering / Incineration / /

SocialTag