Chicago-Kent Journal / Coca-Cola Co. / Kellogg / Sunmark Inc. / Lasting Impression Inc. / Lasting Impression I Inc. / Ocean Spray / Respondent Lasting Impression I Inc. / Abercrombie & Fitch Co. / Apple Computer / Fly Inc. / KP Permanent Make-Up Inc. / Procedural Background Petitioner KP Permanent Inc / News America Publishing Inc. / Hunting World Inc. / Dollar Park and Fly Inc. / /
Country
United States / /
Event
Legal Issues / /
Facility
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision / District Court / Carleton College / University School / /
IndustryTerm
web searches / make-up products / obfuscated trademark law / law trademark / /
NaturalFeature
Ocean Spray Cranberries / /
Organization
United States Supreme Court / School of Management / Court of Appeals Decision / Antitrust Division / Patent and Trademark Office / District Court / United States Department of Justice / District and Appellate Court / Congress / Carleton College / Santa Clara University School of Law / Court of Appeals / UN Court / /
Person
Rajiv Dharnidharka / Carolyn Renner / Kennedy / J. Thomas McCarthy / Terri Wells / Ellen Kreitzberg / Allen Hammond / /
Originally published in Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Cite as: 4 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 289 Still A Ball of Confusion: KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. By Nikki Pope1