Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Reading / Readability / Usability / Human–computer interaction / Reading comprehension / Usability testing / Flesch–Kincaid readability test / Typography / Evaluation / Readability tests / Linguistics / Science


TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATING DRAFT LEGISLATION
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2013-04-11 00:41:54

Open Document

File Size: 186,57 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Victoria / Pittsburgh / Vancouver / Toronto / Washington DC / Reading / New York / Farmingdale / /

Company

IBM / Columbia Law Review / GM / /

Facility

Carnegie-Mellon University / R. Bar / University of Toronto / /

IndustryTerm

behaviour protocol / verbal protocols / Eye movement protocols / behaviour protocols / measurement tools / motor protocols / think-aloud protocols / think-aloud protocol / /

OperatingSystem

Unix / Macintosh / /

Organization

Commonwealth Association of Legislative / Communication Design Centre / Law Drafting Division / Carnegie-Mellon University / Australian State Parliamentary Counsel’s Office / National Council of Teachers of English / 16th International Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing / University of Toronto / American Council of Life Insurance / Centre for Computing / /

Person

Lloyd-Jones / J. H. Kennan / Urbana II / Law Drafting / /

Position

advocate / counsel / editor / Deputy Government Crown Counsel / evaluator / Writer / drafter / legislative counsel / available / legislative counsel / Counsel and the author / Attorney General / human evaluator / Attorney-General / Carpenter / /

ProvinceOrState

New York / Victoria / /

PublishedMedium

The Dynamic Text Guide / Columbia Law Review / /

SportsLeague

International Association / /

Technology

behaviour protocol / think-aloud protocol / Eye movement protocols / sometimes called motor protocols / thinking-aloud verbal protocols / Unix / think-aloud protocols / behaviour protocols / /

SocialTag