Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Industrial agriculture / Bell System / Meatpacking / Statement of work / Systems engineering / Tyson Foods / AT&T / Clayton Antitrust Act / Wild boar / Agriculture / Meat / Food and drink


Competitive Impact Statement: U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Tyson Foods, Inc. and The Hillshire Brands Company
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-09-11 15:24:28


Open Document

File Size: 207,48 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Atkinson / Springdale / St. Paul / Monroe City / Sioux City / Burlington / Newbern / Washington / DC / Jones / Windom / Chicago / /

Company

Defendant Tyson Foods Inc. / The Hillshire Brands Company / Tyson Fresh Meats Inc. / Defendant Hillshire / Heinold Hog Markets / TYSON FOODS INC. / Tyson Hog Markets Inc. / /

Continent

AMERICA / /

Country

United States / /

Currency

USD / /

Event

Earnings Announcement / M&A / Business Partnership / /

Facility

Hillshire plant / Hillshire’s Tennessee facility / /

IndustryTerm

retail / transportation costs / internet website / pork products / food products / /

Organization

Antitrust Division / Divestiture Trustee’s commission / Federal Trade Commission / United States Department of Justice / U.S. Department of Justice / UN Court / /

Person

Jimmy Dean / William H. Stallings / /

Position

farmer / particular farmer / Monitoring Trustee / trustee / Divestiture Trustee / /

ProgrammingLanguage

DC / /

ProvinceOrState

Nebraska / Minnesota / Maryland / Illinois / Indiana / Michigan / Missouri / Tennessee / Delaware / North Carolina / Iowa / Arkansas / /

SocialTag