<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Linguistics / Syntax / Cognitive science / Parts of speech / Grammar / Syntactic categories / Linguistic typology / Lexical functional grammar / Participle / Gerund / Phrase / Nominal
Date: 2016-05-19 10:37:08
Linguistics
Syntax
Cognitive science
Parts of speech
Grammar
Syntactic categories
Linguistic typology
Lexical functional grammar
Participle
Gerund
Phrase
Nominal

Mixed categories and participles: syntax and morphology The standard LFG approach to mixed categories was developed by Bresnan (1997, Figures 1–2, illustrating two of the possible structures). In certain respect

Add to Reading List

Source URL: nlp.ipipan.waw.pl

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 232,48 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

The Prepositional Passive in Lexical Functional Grammar Jamie Y. Findlay  1  Introduction

The Prepositional Passive in Lexical Functional Grammar Jamie Y. Findlay 1 Introduction

DocID: 1rBbw - View Document

Templates and phrasal analyses of argument structure constructions

Templates and phrasal analyses of argument structure constructions

DocID: 1rr1e - View Document

Mixed categories and participles: syntax and morphology The standard LFG approach to mixed categories was developed by Bresnan (1997, Figures 1–2, illustrating two of the possible structures). In certain respect

Mixed categories and participles: syntax and morphology The standard LFG approach to mixed categories was developed by Bresnan (1997, Figures 1–2, illustrating two of the possible structures). In certain respect

DocID: 1rqHC - View Document

Second-position clitics and the syntax-prosody interface: The case of Ancient Greek David Goldstein (Vienna/UCLA) and Dag Haug (University of Oslo) Introduction Recent work on clitics in LFG (e.g. B¨ogel et alha

Second-position clitics and the syntax-prosody interface: The case of Ancient Greek David Goldstein (Vienna/UCLA) and Dag Haug (University of Oslo) Introduction Recent work on clitics in LFG (e.g. B¨ogel et alha

DocID: 1qIFE - View Document

Grammatical functions: a problematic fundamental concept of LFG? Agnieszka Patejuk, Adam Przepiórkowski {aep,adamp}@ipipan.waw.pl Introduction While LFG emphasises that grammatical functions (GFs) are first-class lingui

Grammatical functions: a problematic fundamental concept of LFG? Agnieszka Patejuk, Adam Przepiórkowski {aep,adamp}@ipipan.waw.pl Introduction While LFG emphasises that grammatical functions (GFs) are first-class lingui

DocID: 1qhrh - View Document