See Super Sack Mfg. / Bancroft & Masters Inc. / Chase Packaging Corp. / Nucleonics Inc. / Amana Refrigeration Inc. / Augusta National Inc. / Nike Inc. / MedImmune Inc. / Aspex Eyewear Inc. / Super Sack Mfg. / W.T. Grant Co. / Earth Inc. / Revolution Eyewear Inc. / Union Carbide Corp. / Aetna / Affordable Media LLC / Genentech Inc. / Continental Bank Corp. / Ninth Circuit / Already LLC / See BP Chems. Ltd. / Quadlux Inc. / Benitec Australia Ltd. / /
Country
United States / /
Event
Legal Issues / M&A / /
Facility
University of California / /
IndustryTerm
accused eyewear products / federal law / possible solution / contract law / /
Organization
School of Law / University of California / Berkeley / FEDERAL COURT / Nike’s Air Force / Augusta National Golf Club in Georgia / U.S. Supreme Court / Federal Government / U.S. Court of Appeals / UN Court / Professional Golfers’ Association / Air Force / Friends of the Earth / NIKE AIR FORCE / /
Person
Misa K. Eiritz / Joseph Van Tassel / Milton Springut / Sidney A. Diamond / Kevin Snell / Tal S. Benschar / David Kalow / Dalila Argaez Wendlandt / Dyk / Lyle Denniston / /
SHOULD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OWNERS JUST DO IT? AN EXAMINATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF NIKE’S COVENANT NOT TO SUE Misa K. Eiritz † In January 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court manifested its desire to rein in abusive litigati