First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2006-11-07 21:06:01Kirillov model Langlands program Induced representation Whittaker model Admissible representation Valuation Cuspidal representation Gelfand pair Representation theory of finite groups Abstract algebra Representation theory Automorphic forms | Vol. 104, No. 1 DUKE MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL © 2000Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.math.tifr.res.inDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 172,01 KBShare Document on Facebook |
A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory Peter Webb February 23, 2016 Preface The representation theory of finite groups has a long history, going back to the 19thDocID: 1r8MU - View Document | |
Microsoft Word - fall 10 Newsletter draft.docDocID: 1qUkh - View Document | |
Model theory of finite and pseudofinite groups Dugald Macpherson∗, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK,DocID: 1qU5n - View Document | |
445 Documenta Math. Some Consequences of the Karpenko-Merkurjev TheoremDocID: 1qdcD - View Document | |
ERRATA FOR “CANONICAL SUBGROUPS VIA BREUIL-KISIN MODULES” SHIN HATTORI The proof of [1, Propositionis incorrect. In page 950 line 1–2, the author claims that the assertion (2) of the proposition is deduceDocID: 1qcQX - View Document |