The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time∗ Andrew Gelman† and Eric - Gelman - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time∗ Andrew Gelman† and Eric Add to Reading List Document Date: 2013-11-18 16:49:17 Open Document File Size: 214,76 KB Share Result on Facebook City Washington / Mullainathan / / Company Simmons / / Country Argentina / United States / / Facility Columbia University / / IndustryTerm internet sample / data processing / huge media attention / healthcare context / internet participants / / Organization Department of Human Development and Family Studies / National Science Foundation / Columbia University / New York / Department of Statistics / / Person Macartan Humphreys / Howard Wainer / Ed Vul / Barack Obama / E. J. Wagenmakers / Andrew Gelman / Eric Loken / Mitt Romney / / PoliticalEvent presidential election / presidential general election / / Position researcher / King / unscrupulous researcher / general research hypothesis / / ProvinceOrState New York / / Technology MRI / / SocialTag Data dredging Statistical power Statistical hypothesis testing F-test Multiple comparisons P-value Statistical significance Data analysis Menstrual cycle Statistics

The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time∗ Andrew Gelman† and EricAdd to Reading List