KABLE, KIRK AND JUDICIAL STATESMANSHIP JEFFREY GOLDSWORTHY* I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to ask the following question: when the Constitution is clear, is it the High Court’s duty to apply it stri

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-11-13 18:32:11 High Court of Australia Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions William Gummow Supreme court Dyson Heydon State court Federal jurisdiction Fardon v Attorney-General Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally Australian constitutional law Law Politics of Australia		KABLE, KIRK AND JUDICIAL STATESMANSHIP JEFFREY GOLDSWORTHY* I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to ask the following question: when the Constitution is clear, is it the High Court’s duty to apply it stri Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.monash.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 560,21 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Australian ‘Bikie’ Laws in the Absence of an Express Bill of Rights In this article, I discuss so-called ‘bikie’ legislation introduced already in some Australian states and suggested in others. I will use this c DocID: 187xD - View Document
	Starting Point Question in exam may ask to explore whether Kable was correct in its narrow interpretation, or whether it shows the HCA to uphold protection of human rights, or (likely) whether recent cases are showing t DocID: 17Tqi - View Document
	Advancing Together Rule of Law Updates and Perspectives from Australia Volume 1 • Issue 1 December 2012 DocID: 14ZYK - View Document
	DOC Document DocID: 14piy - View Document
	SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: A-G v FardonQSC 200 PARTIES: DocID: 13WJw - View Document