<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Law / Supreme Court of the United States / Searches and seizures / Warrants / Utah v. Strieff / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Criminal law / Exclusionary rule / Search warrant / United States v. Brignoni-Ponce / Arrest warrant / Terry v. Ohio
Date: 2016-06-22 11:49:03
Law
Supreme Court of the United States
Searches and seizures
Warrants
Utah v. Strieff
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Criminal law
Exclusionary rule
Search warrant
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
Arrest warrant
Terry v. Ohio

Cite as: 579 U. S. ____SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting

Add to Reading List

Source URL: gbitchspot.com

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 89,94 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No___________

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No___________

DocID: 1rsmc - View Document

Searches and seizures / Law / Common law / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Search warrant / Search and seizure / Probable cause / Reasonable suspicion / Expectation of privacy / Terry stop / Exigent circumstance / Miranda warning

Criminal Procedure Outline – SpringCarnahan I. 4th Amendment: An Overview “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall

DocID: 1riDJ - View Document

NYC:  STOP-AND-FRISK DOWN  SAFETY

NYC: STOP-AND-FRISK DOWN SAFETY

DocID: 1r9in - View Document

An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force

An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force

DocID: 1r70B - View Document

[Cite as State v. Dickerson, 179 Ohio App.3d 754, 2008-OhioIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

[Cite as State v. Dickerson, 179 Ohio App.3d 754, 2008-OhioIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

DocID: 1r4aA - View Document