Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Community building / Urban agriculture / Environmentalism / Evaluation methods / Healthcare / Gardening / Guerrilla gardening / Community gardening / Randomized controlled trial / Environment / Science / Knowledge


Are interventions to reduce the impact of arsenic contamination of groundwater on human health in developing countries effective?: a systematic review protocol
Add to Reading List

Open Document

File Size: 1,06 MB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Philadelphia / Melbourne / Austin / Edinburgh / /

Company

Merrill / Wilson / Medline / Case / Creative Commons / BioMed Central Ltd. / Google / /

Continent

Asia / South America / /

Country

United States / Australia / United Kingdom / /

/

Facility

University of Exeter Medical School / UK's National Institute of Health / University of Exeter / /

IndustryTerm

appropriate search syntax / search string / Search terms / review protocol / food quality / organisational web sites / web presence / grey literature search / mixed method systematic review protocol / food poverty / search strategy / web searches / web engines / search techniques / collective livestock management / web-searches / food insecurity / surplus products / instance Web / food / be sought using a broad and diverse search strategy to address the four review questions / /

Organization

National Institute of Health / Royal Horticultural Society / European Centre for Environment and Human Health / American Community Garden Association / Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens / University of Exeter Medical School / University of Exeter / Federation of City / /

Person

Bing etc / /

Position

author / information specialist / researcher / paid coordinator / Co-operative / /

ProvinceOrState

Missouri / /

PublishedMedium

Baseline / /

Region

southern Africa / /

Technology

1/20 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL / review protocol / mixed method systematic review protocol / /

URL

http /

SocialTag