Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Hazards / Ocean pollution / Oil spill / Emergency / Petroleum / Oil spill governance in the United States / Deepwater Horizon oil spill / Soft matter / Public safety / Emergency management


Comments on Tanker Panel Review Prepared by Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC June 11, 2013 Executive Summary These comments were prepared by Nuka Research and Planning, LLC on behalf of the Haisla Nation Council in
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2013-07-05 12:04:49

Open Document

File Size: 96,48 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Montreal / Vancouver / /

Company

Nuka Research and Planning LLC / Genivar Inc. / Planning Group LLC / Ship-Source Oil Pollution Fund / Transport Canada / Enbridge / /

Country

Canada / United States / US / /

Currency

USD / /

Event

Man-Made Disaster / Product Issues / Environmental Issue / /

Facility

Port of Kitimat / Port of Vancouver / /

IndustryTerm

spill response systems / worst-case oil spill / oil spill impacts / marine oil spills / oil spill response options / transportation / sunken oil spills / on-water oil spill / ship-source oil / m3 oil / oil exploration activities / marine oil spill / offshore oil spills / marine communications / marine oil spill response / oil spill response / response equipment / oil/water mixing / oil spill prevention / diluted bitumen oil spills / on-water oil spill recovery capacity / oil spill preparedness / on-water oil spill response / crude oil / petroleum products / sufficient oil spill response capability / oil spills / oil product / marine transportation projects / travel time / marine oil spill preparedness / response systems / oil spreads / tankers carrying oil / marine oil spill risks / oil spill liability limits / oil transportation / non-mechanical response technologies / regulations governing oil spill preparedness / oil products / oil slick / oil spill system / technology gaps / oil spill prevention measures / oil sinking / unconventional oil products / oil spill exercises / on-water oil spill recovery / oil spill / technology transfers / spill site / oil / mechanical spill response equipment / oil spill cleanup / land-based oil spill symposium / oil pollution / oil spill response community / oil industries / oil spill risk assessments / federal law / oil spill plans / oil spill response vessels / Oil spill response capacity / insufficient infrastructure / spill response equipment / oil spill recovery capacity / possible spill management technologies / levy systems / oil pollution funds / implement oil spill prevention / vessel traffic management / oil handling facilities / higher viscosity oil / maritime oil spill risk assessments / response management systems / marine oil pollution / oil spill risks / /

NaturalFeature

Baltic Sea / Kalamazoo River / BC coast / Pacific coast / Gulf of Mexico / Cook Inlet / /

Organization

US National Academy of Sciences / Helsinki Commission / Response Organization / Enhance government / Canadian government / Canadian Coast Guard / US federal government / Government of Canada / National Advisory Council / Unified Command / Haisla Nation Council / Charbonneau Commission of Inquiry / federal government / National Energy Board / BC Ministry of Environment / /

Person

William Sound / /

Position

General / contractor / Executive / current model for regulated response capacity / representative / Prince / commander / /

Product

present liability / materials / /

ProvinceOrState

Alaska / British Columbia / /

PublishedMedium

the Tanker Panel Review / the Northern Gateway JRP review / The TERMPOL review / The Northern Gateway review / /

Region

Canada’s west coast / Gulf of Mexico / west coast / /

Technology

possible spill management technologies / non-mechanical response technologies / /

SocialTag