Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Voting theory / Psephology / Political philosophy / Tactical voting / IP / NP / Instant-runoff voting / XTR / Single winner electoral systems / Voting / Social choice theory


Universal Voting Protocol Tweaks to Make Manipulation Hard∗ Vincent Conitzer and Tuomas Sandholm Carnegie Mellon University
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2003-04-28 20:04:25

Open Document

File Size: 93,38 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Edmonton / Anaheim / Chambery / Austin / /

Company

Introduction Often / /

Country

France / Canada / /

/

Event

FDA Phase / /

IndustryTerm

deterministic protocol / multiagent systems / software agents / deterministic protocols / typical protocols / recommender systems / computing / given voting protocol / /

Organization

National Science Foundation / Tuomas Sandholm Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science Department / /

Person

Craig A. Tovey / Vincent Conitzer / David M Pennock / Tuomas Sandholm / Bush / Jeffrey S Rosenschein / C. Lee Giles / Michael A. Trick / John J. Bartholdi / III / Eric Horvitz / Leslie Valiant / Eithan Ephrati / James B. Orlin / /

Product

Bang & Olufsen Form 2 Headphone/Headset / R1 / /

ProvinceOrState

Texas / California / /

PublishedMedium

Theoretical Computer Science / Journal of Economic Theory / /

Technology

Second Order Copeland protocol / STV protocol / deterministic protocol / randomized protocol / Plurality protocol / Universal Voting Protocol / voting protocol / Borda protocol / voting algorithm / Maximin protocol / given voting protocol / resulting protocol / /

SocialTag