Reprinted from MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, April 2007, Vol. 105, No. 6. Copyright 2007 by The Michigan Law Review Association.

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2007-07-06 14:16:00 Native American Church Unemployment in the United States Case law Douglas Laycock United States Constitution Marci Hamilton Religious Freedom Restoration Act City of Boerne v. Flores Harm principle Law Government Employment Division v. Smith		Reprinted from MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, April 2007, Vol. 105, No. 6. Copyright 2007 by The Michigan Law Review Association. Add to Reading List Source URL: churchstatelaw.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 116,35 KB Share Document on Facebook

	SmartMOVES - Mobility Standards and the Association of Safe Patient Handling Professional guidelines In healthcare, a principle imperative has been established to “First, do no harm.” Historically, we have applied th DocID: 1l5Lp - View Document
	The Journal of Legal Medicine, 28:37–52 Copyright C 2007 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC $12.00 + .00 DOI: APPLYING THE “DO NO HARM” PRINCIPLE DocID: 1kthm - View Document
	Harm reduction Prevention and treatment of addictions Main Principle Preventing is better than Curing Curing is better than Harm Reduction DocID: 1ddHu - View Document
	A NEW ARGUMENT FOR THE MAXIMIN PRINCIPLE1 The natural distribution [of talents] is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts. DocID: 19mdg - View Document
	International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law (international liability in case of loss from transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities): Comments a DocID: 13gOS - View Document