<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / United States federal law / United States Sentencing Commission / Blakely v. Washington / United States v. Booker / Compliance and ethics program / Ricardo Hinojosa / Sentence / Rita v. United States / United States criminal procedure / Criminal procedure / Law
Date: 2014-01-08 18:19:42
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
United States federal law
United States Sentencing Commission
Blakely v. Washington
United States v. Booker
Compliance and ethics program
Ricardo Hinojosa
Sentence
Rita v. United States
United States criminal procedure
Criminal procedure
Law

Guidelines Newletter October 2004

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ussc.gov.

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 112,49 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

DocID: 1u8YR - View Document

Case: Document: Page: 1

Case: Document: Page: 1

DocID: 1pL6K - View Document

JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the

JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the

DocID: 1os0A - View Document

Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW

Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW

DocID: 1my60 - View Document

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH

DocID: 1ll9b - View Document