<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Algebra / Abstract algebra / Group theory / Finite groups / Representation theory / Finite fields / Conjectures / Classification of finite simple groups / Representation theory of finite groups / Reductive group / Modular representation theory / McKay conjecture
Date: 2018-07-25 13:17:42
Algebra
Abstract algebra
Group theory
Finite groups
Representation theory
Finite fields
Conjectures
Classification of finite simple groups
Representation theory of finite groups
Reductive group
Modular representation theory
McKay conjecture

Proc. Int. Cong. of Math. – 2018 Rio de Janeiro, Vol–248) REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS AND APPLICATIONS Pham Huu Tiep

Add to Reading List

Source URL: eta.impa.br

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 508,39 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory Peter Webb February 23, 2016 Preface The representation theory of finite groups has a long history, going back to the 19th

A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory Peter Webb February 23, 2016 Preface The representation theory of finite groups has a long history, going back to the 19th

DocID: 1r8MU - View Document

Microsoft Word - fall 10 Newsletter draft.doc

Microsoft Word - fall 10 Newsletter draft.doc

DocID: 1qUkh - View Document

Model theory of finite and pseudofinite groups Dugald Macpherson∗, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK,

Model theory of finite and pseudofinite groups Dugald Macpherson∗, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK,

DocID: 1qU5n - View Document

445  Documenta Math. Some Consequences of the Karpenko-Merkurjev Theorem

445 Documenta Math. Some Consequences of the Karpenko-Merkurjev Theorem

DocID: 1qdcD - View Document

ERRATA FOR “CANONICAL SUBGROUPS VIA BREUIL-KISIN MODULES” SHIN HATTORI The proof of [1, Propositionis incorrect. In page 950 line 1–2, the author claims that the assertion (2) of the proposition is deduce

ERRATA FOR “CANONICAL SUBGROUPS VIA BREUIL-KISIN MODULES” SHIN HATTORI The proof of [1, Propositionis incorrect. In page 950 line 1–2, the author claims that the assertion (2) of the proposition is deduce

DocID: 1qcQX - View Document