Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Motion / Privacy of telecommunications / Principles / Mass surveillance / Government / Mitchell v. Forsyth / Privacy law / Immunity / Qualified immunity / Law


13‐2963‐cv(L)  Drimal v. Makol, et al.    In the  United States Court of Appeals 
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2015-05-15 13:57:31

Open Document

File Size: 207,11 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

New Haven / New York / /

Company

Ikanos / Panther Partners Inc. / Daikin / GLASSER / Wiggin & Dana / LLP / /

Country

United States / /

Event

Judicial Event / /

Facility

United States District Court / /

IndustryTerm

marital telephone calls / cellular telephone / telephone conversations / /

Organization

United States Court of Appeals For / United States Attorney’s office for the District of Connecticut / Federal Bureau of Investigation / United States District Court for the District of Connecticut / /

Person

JOHN M. WALKER / JR. / Richard J. Sullivan / CHRISTOPHER DEGRAFF / DAVID MAKOL / Stuart F. Delery / MARK MUNSTER / PAULINE TAI / Warren W. Eginton / EDWARD HIMMEL / KEVIN RIORDAN / JAN TRIGG / Barbara L. Herwig / BRIAN HARKINS / Deirdre M. Daly / MARTHA M. BERDOTE / ADRIAN BUSBY / ARLENE VILLAMIA DRIMAL / JOANN MAGUIRE / DAVID J. FORD / FRANK LOMONACO / MARIA A. FONT / EDMUND ROM / Catherine H. Dorsey / JOHN R. WILLIAMS / /

Position

Attorney / Circuit Judge / Deputy Assistant Attorney General / General / Assistant United States Attorney / Judge / Special Agent / /

ProvinceOrState

Connecticut / /

Technology

cellular telephone / /

SocialTag