Goldman Sachs Group Inc. / UnitedHealth Group Inc. / Enron / Citigroup Inc. / Service Inc. / Navistar International Corp. / Merck / Bank of America / Worldcom / Denver University Law Review / /
Country
Australia / United Kingdom / /
Currency
USD / EUR / /
Facility
University Law Review Online / University of Denver Sturm College / /
IndustryTerm
bank regulators / instructed bank regulators / state law / compensation systems / incentive-based compensation systems / securities law reform / bank / investment bank / state law approach / securities law / law professors / /
Organization
European Financial Management Association / Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System / University of Denver / Denver Sturm College of Law / FINRA / Congress / SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee / US Supreme Court / U.S. Court of Appeals / UN Court / Colorado Coalition for the Homeless / Department of Treasury / Securities and Exchange Commission / /
Person
Christine Azar / Holger Spamann / Harwell Wells / J. Robert Brown / Jr. / Charles B. Vincent / Randall S. Thomas / Charles Elson / Christina Rexrode / Jing Luo / Frank M. Song / Raphael Minder / Perk / /
Position
Professor of Law and Director of the Corporate Commercial Law Program / CEO and CFO / director compensation / The Path Forward / compensation consultant / independent legal counsel / Severely Limit Executive / director independent / Secretary / CEO and chairman / CEO / arbitrator / Governor / chairman / Professor / director / Director independence / Executive / director defendants / Executive Compensation Executive / CFO / adviser / chairman of the board of directors / /
ProvinceOrState
Minnesota / West Bank / Columbia Circuit / Delaware / Arizona / /
Financial Institutions, the Market, and the Continuing Problem of Executive Compensation J. Robert Brown, Jr. Introduction Excessive risk, however, was not the only problem associated with compensation that