York v. Performance Auto, Inc., 2011 UT App 257, August 4, 2011 In York, the Court of Appeals concluded that based upon Rule 54(b) and Utah Supreme Court authority, to be final for appeal, a judgment must end the contro - James A. Davis - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	York v. Performance Auto, Inc., 2011 UT App 257, August 4, 2011 In York, the Court of Appeals concluded that based upon Rule 54(b) and Utah Supreme Court authority, to be final for appeal, a judgment must end the contro Add to Reading List Document Date: 2014-10-21 12:40:01 Open Document File Size: 29,50 KB Share Result on Facebook City Slavens / York / / Company Performance Auto Inc. / Sunrise Title Co. / / Organization Court of Appeals / Utah Supreme Court / / Position Hunter / / URL http / SocialTag Government Appeal Appellate review Lawsuits Supreme court James Z. Davis Vexatious litigation Law Court systems Legal procedure

York v. Performance Auto, Inc., 2011 UT App 257, August 4, 2011 In York, the Court of Appeals concluded that based upon Rule 54(b) and Utah Supreme Court authority, to be final for appeal, a judgment must end the controAdd to Reading List