Case Management Systems / USA today / Thomson / Elo / Viewsonic / Microsoft / Apple / /
Country
United States / Singapore / /
Facility
Maricopa County Superior Court / Delaware Chancery Court / /
IndustryTerm
fewer systems / few systems / e-ink devices / portable devices / e-signatures / e-ink / self-represented solution / system audit / document management systems / word processing / potential solution / Online system / manual processing / e-delivery / rapid delivery systems / Online Security / even write-once media / e-filing / overall e-filing solution / manual file systems / electronic systems / electronic online filer/response system / electronic document systems / federation systems / e-filing systems / interactive desktop work surface / retail store / case law / technology project / printing / digital rights management / online identities / human services / online capabilities / court automation systems / government-to-government systems / featured word processing system / web server / displays and systems / law enforcement / access applications / e-filed / printing documents / advocating designing e-filing systems / /
OperatingSystem
Microsoft Windows / /
Organization
National Center for State Courts / Delaware Chancery Court / Maricopa County Superior Court / WordPerfect / and Open Office / COSCA/NACM Joint Technology Committee / Nevada State District Court / US Department of Justice / UN Court / E-Filing Should Support Government / Texas Supreme Court / Libre Office / Colorado District Court / /
Person
Connie Steinheimer / Barak Obama / O. John Kuenhold / Malcolm Gladwell / /
XML / PDF / 3 The COSCA/NACM Joint Technology / Surface technology / rapidly maturing technology / Uniform Resource Name / cell phones / XML technology / digital signature / web server / /
Rules of E-Filing1 By James E. McMillan, National Center for State Courts, 2011 As in any technology project, the “devil” is in implementation and acceptance of the new system by the judges and court staff. E-filing