<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Supreme Court of the United States / Knock-and-announce / Antonin Scalia / John Roberts / No-knock warrant / Exclusionary rule / Hudson v. Michigan / Law / Conservatism in the United States / Searches and seizures
Date: 2008-06-24 00:23:09
Supreme Court of the United States
Knock-and-announce
Antonin Scalia
John Roberts
No-knock warrant
Exclusionary rule
Hudson v. Michigan
Law
Conservatism in the United States
Searches and seizures

Oral Argument Transcript

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 230,66 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Law / Supreme Court of the United States / Searches and seizures / Warrants / Utah v. Strieff / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Criminal law / Exclusionary rule / Search warrant / United States v. Brignoni-Ponce / Arrest warrant / Terry v. Ohio

Cite as: 579 U. S. ____SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting

DocID: 1r2f9 - View Document

Evidence law / Law / Epistemology / Common law / Relevance / Evidence / Confession / Exclusionary rule / Adversarial system / Public policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidence

Very rough draft: not to quote Giovanni Tuzet Università Bocconi, Milan EPISTEMIC AND PRACTICAL CONCERNS:

DocID: 1qJIZ - View Document

Searches and seizures / Evidence law / Privacy of telecommunications / James Madison / Exclusionary rule / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / United States Constitution / American Civil Liberties Union / Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure / Search warrant / Probable cause / Constitutional amendment

Digital Searches and Seizures: Overview of Proposed Amendments to Rule 41 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure

DocID: 1pKLD - View Document

Searches and seizures / Utah v. Strieff / Tani Cantil-Sakauye / Antonin Scalia / Supreme Court of the United States / Hudson v. Michigan / Language interpretation / Judge / Exclusionary rule / Judiciary of California / Precedent / UC Davis School of Law

SAN FRANCISCO www.dailyjournal.com TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2016 VOL. 122 NO. 40

DocID: 1p4Y1 - View Document

IN DEFENSE OF EVIDENCE AND AGAINST THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE: A LIBERTARIAN APPROACH PATRICK TINSLEY, N. STEPHAN KINSELLA AND WALTER BLOCK* I. INTRODUCTION If a liberal favors something, it is a safe bet you should oppose i

DocID: 1o2tB - View Document