No[removed]IN THE ____________ RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY, J R.

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2004-03-09 13:43:52 Juries Ring v. Arizona Apprendi v. New Jersey United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines In re Winship Jones v. United States Mandatory sentencing Cunningham v. California Blakely v. Washington Law Case law United States criminal procedure		No[removed]IN THE ____________ RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY, J R. Add to Reading List Source URL: supreme.lp.findlaw.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 198,70 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Singapore, 6th of July 2017 Jury corps for IYPT 2017  Experienced jurors who have already been in IYPT juries in the previous years DocID: 1ukWu - View Document
	Trial by Machine ANDREA ROTH* This Article explores the rise of “machines” in criminal adjudication. Human witnesses now often give way to gadgets and interpretive software, juries’ complex judgments about moral bl DocID: 1sULo - View Document
	Portfolio Media. Inc. \| 111 West 19th Street, 5th Floor \| New York, NY 10011 \| www.law360.com Phone: + \| Fax: + \| Halo Gives Juries Bigger Role On Enhanced Patent Da DocID: 1sIIg - View Document
	2006 UCLA J.L. & Tech. 3 JUDGING JURIES: EVALUATING RENEWED PROPOSALS FOR SPECIALIZED JURIES FROM A PUBLIC CHOICE PERSPECTIVE Beth Z. Shaw ABSTRACT This article evaluates whether specialized juries are better in dealing DocID: 1sdJq - View Document
	feature article Representative Juries: Examining the Initial and Eligible Pools of Juries by Elizabeth Neeley, Ph.D. DocID: 1rRtx - View Document