<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / United States federal law / Sentencing / Identity theft / Mandatory sentencing / Fraud / Rita v. United States / United States v. Booker / Law / Crimes / Criminal law
Date: 2015-01-09 12:08:44
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
United States federal law
Sentencing
Identity theft
Mandatory sentencing
Fraud
Rita v. United States
United States v. Booker
Law
Crimes
Criminal law

Chief Judge Patti B. Saris Chair, United States Sentencing Commission Remarks for Public Meeting January 9, 2015 Thank you all for coming to this public meeting of the United States Sentencing Commission. As always, we a

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ussc.gov.

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 26,89 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

DocID: 1u8YR - View Document

Case: Document: Page: 1

Case: Document: Page: 1

DocID: 1pL6K - View Document

JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the

JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the

DocID: 1os0A - View Document

Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW

Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW

DocID: 1my60 - View Document

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH

DocID: 1ll9b - View Document