On June 9, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment as a matter of law that U.S. Patent No. 5,045,172, which related to a capillary electrophoresis device, was invalid as obvious. The Federal Ci - KSR - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	On June 9, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment as a matter of law that U.S. Patent No. 5,045,172, which related to a capillary electrophoresis device, was invalid as obvious. The Federal Ci Add to Reading List Document Date: 2005-07-01 10:06:43 Open Document File Size: 182,67 KB Share Result on Facebook Company Princeton Biochemicals Inc. / Beckman Coulter Inc. / / / IndustryTerm capillary electrophoresis device / / Person Lawrence M. Sung / / / Technology electrophoresis / / SocialTag Property law Inventive step and non-obviousness Person having ordinary skill in the art Title 35 of the United States Code Prior art Claim United States patent law Novelty and non-obviousness in Canadian patent law KSR v. Teleflex Patent law

On June 9, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment as a matter of law that U.S. Patent No. 5,045,172, which related to a capillary electrophoresis device, was invalid as obvious. The Federal CiAdd to Reading List