<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States courts of appeals / Law / Criminal law / Mandatory sentencing / Sentencing / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / Flores-Figueroa v. United States / Theft / Identity theft / United States v. Clark / Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States / Aggravated felony
Date: 2015-08-21 08:19:13
United States courts of appeals
Law
Criminal law
Mandatory sentencing
Sentencing
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Flores-Figueroa v. United States
Theft
Identity theft
United States v. Clark
Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States
Aggravated felony

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Federal Aggravated Identity Theft

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.fas.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 535,47 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Microsoft Word - Presidential Decree No. 749.doc

Microsoft Word - Presidential Decree No. 749.doc

DocID: 1rf1q - View Document

C:\150625\TITLE52E.XYW  EXPLANATION OF H.R. 2832, TO MAKE TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO UPDATE STATUTORY REFERENCES TO CERTAIN PROVISONS CLASSIFIED TO TITLE 52, UNITED STATES CODE  BACKGROUND

C:\150625\TITLE52E.XYW EXPLANATION OF H.R. 2832, TO MAKE TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO UPDATE STATUTORY REFERENCES TO CERTAIN PROVISONS CLASSIFIED TO TITLE 52, UNITED STATES CODE BACKGROUND

DocID: 1r9RT - View Document

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Federal Aggravated Identity Theft

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Federal Aggravated Identity Theft

DocID: 1qhyv - View Document

PROOF THAT THERE IS A “STRAW MAN”  “That millions of people share the same forms of mental pathology does not make these people sane.” [Eric Fromm] Proof that There Is a “Straw man” Copyright Sovereignty Educ

PROOF THAT THERE IS A “STRAW MAN” “That millions of people share the same forms of mental pathology does not make these people sane.” [Eric Fromm] Proof that There Is a “Straw man” Copyright Sovereignty Educ

DocID: 1pUzB - View Document

SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 103, Appendix 2 March 7, 2016 FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO EMPLOYEE CONDUCT Many activities may violate not only these standards of conduct, but also federal statutes. As a result, in addition to any di

SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 103, Appendix 2 March 7, 2016 FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO EMPLOYEE CONDUCT Many activities may violate not only these standards of conduct, but also federal statutes. As a result, in addition to any di

DocID: 1pO33 - View Document