<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Searches and seizures / United States v. Place / Police dog / Kyllo v. United States / Expectation of privacy / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Terry v. Ohio / Katz v. United States / Search and seizure / Law / Privacy law / Case law
Date: 2012-02-15 15:52:51
Searches and seizures
United States v. Place
Police dog
Kyllo v. United States
Expectation of privacy
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Terry v. Ohio
Katz v. United States
Search and seizure
Law
Privacy law
Case law

Florida Supreme Court Opinion SC08-2101

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.floridasupremecourt.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 329,03 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE  CHAPTER SIX OTHER PROVISIONS Section 601. Search and Seizure (a)

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER SIX OTHER PROVISIONS Section 601. Search and Seizure (a)

DocID: 1vmfG - View Document

[Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SMITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioSearch and seizure — Search incident to arr

[Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SMITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioSearch and seizure — Search incident to arr

DocID: 1sYwV - View Document

Searches and seizures / Law / Common law / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Search warrant / Search and seizure / Probable cause / Reasonable suspicion / Expectation of privacy / Terry stop / Exigent circumstance / Miranda warning

Criminal Procedure Outline – SpringCarnahan I. 4th Amendment: An Overview “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall

DocID: 1riDJ - View Document

Some CASE LAW for consideration Fifth Revision Escobedo v Illinois, 378 US): Illegal search and seizure. Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, pages); 14 or 15 L.Ed. 2d ??: -“Where rights secured by

Some CASE LAW for consideration Fifth Revision Escobedo v Illinois, 378 US): Illegal search and seizure. Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, pages); 14 or 15 L.Ed. 2d ??: -“Where rights secured by

DocID: 1qY98 - View Document

1  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 06, 2016

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 06, 2016

DocID: 1qJ75 - View Document