<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Harmelin v. Michigan / Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Atkins v. Virginia / Life imprisonment in the United States / Coker v. Georgia / Roper v. Simmons / Kennedy v. Louisiana / Stanford v. Kentucky / Gregg v. Georgia / Law / Case law / Life imprisonment
Date: 2012-03-28 14:20:26
Harmelin v. Michigan
Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Atkins v. Virginia
Life imprisonment in the United States
Coker v. Georgia
Roper v. Simmons
Kennedy v. Louisiana
Stanford v. Kentucky
Gregg v. Georgia
Law
Case law
Life imprisonment

More Different than Life, Less Different than Death The Argument for According Life Without Parole Its Own Category of Heightened Review Under the Eighth Amendment After Graham v. Florida WILLIAM W. BERRY III

Add to Reading List

Source URL: moritzlaw.osu.edu

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 329,20 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Microsoft Word - Ryan.bki3.doc

Microsoft Word - Ryan.bki3.doc

DocID: 1pMBq - View Document

Microsoft Word - 7$0343z.doc

Microsoft Word - 7$0343z.doc

DocID: 1pJYI - View Document

POLICY BRIEF: JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE  Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview Most of the approximately 2,500 individuals sentenced as juveniles to life without the possibility of parole now have a chance for rel

POLICY BRIEF: JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview Most of the approximately 2,500 individuals sentenced as juveniles to life without the possibility of parole now have a chance for rel

DocID: 1oAII - View Document

PRESENT: All the Justices DARIEN VASQUEZ OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY February 12, 2016

PRESENT: All the Justices DARIEN VASQUEZ OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY February 12, 2016

DocID: 1mtlI - View Document

ROPER v. SIMMONS, 543 U.SMarch 1, 2005] Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. This case requires us to address, for the second time in a decade and a half, whether it is permissible under the Eighth

ROPER v. SIMMONS, 543 U.SMarch 1, 2005] Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. This case requires us to address, for the second time in a decade and a half, whether it is permissible under the Eighth

DocID: 1bqc4 - View Document