First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2016-06-22 11:49:03Law Supreme Court of the United States Searches and seizures Warrants Utah v. Strieff Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Criminal law Exclusionary rule Search warrant United States v. Brignoni-Ponce Arrest warrant Terry v. Ohio | Cite as: 579 U. S. ____SOTOMAYOR, J., dissentingAdd to Reading ListSource URL: gbitchspot.comDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 89,94 KBShare Document on Facebook |
Cite as: 579 U. S. ____SOTOMAYOR, J., dissentingDocID: 1r2f9 - View Document | |
Very rough draft: not to quote Giovanni Tuzet Università Bocconi, Milan EPISTEMIC AND PRACTICAL CONCERNS:DocID: 1qJIZ - View Document | |
Digital Searches and Seizures: Overview of Proposed Amendments to Rule 41 of the Rules of Criminal ProcedureDocID: 1pKLD - View Document | |
SAN FRANCISCO www.dailyjournal.com TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2016 VOL. 122 NO. 40DocID: 1p4Y1 - View Document | |
IN DEFENSE OF EVIDENCE AND AGAINST THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE: A LIBERTARIAN APPROACH PATRICK TINSLEY, N. STEPHAN KINSELLA AND WALTER BLOCK* I. INTRODUCTION If a liberal favors something, it is a safe bet you should oppose iDocID: 1o2tB - View Document |