On July 12, 2005, the Federal Circuit en banc affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, dismissed-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that AWH did not infringe U.S. Patent No.4,677,798, which related - Kirin-Amgen - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	On July 12, 2005, the Federal Circuit en banc affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, dismissed-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that AWH did not infringe U.S. Patent No.4,677,798, which related Add to Reading List Document Date: 2005-08-05 21:32:17 Open Document File Size: 176,22 KB Share Result on Facebook Company AWH Corp. / / / IndustryTerm steel-shell panels / / Organization UN Court / / Person Lawrence M. Sung / / / SocialTag Claim Phillips v. AWH Corp. Dictionary Specification Definition Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Linguistics Lexicography Patent law

On July 12, 2005, the Federal Circuit en banc affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, dismissed-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that AWH did not infringe U.S. Patent No.4,677,798, which related Add to Reading List