<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act / McConnell v. Federal Election Commission / Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission / First Amendment to the United States Constitution / Citizens United / Campaign finance in the United States / Equal Protection Clause / United States Constitution / Independent expenditure / Federal Election Commission / Politics / Law
Date: 2003-12-24 10:59:06
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Citizens United
Campaign finance in the United States
Equal Protection Clause
United States Constitution
Independent expenditure
Federal Election Commission
Politics
Law

Microsoft Word - merits brief.KS.doc

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.realcampaignreform.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 292,57 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Crime Prevention Recommendations for Senior Citizens Senior citizens currently represent the most rapidly growing segment of the population in the United States. Currently, one in every eight Americans is age 65 or older

DocID: 1vds2 - View Document

NOTICE OF INCORPORATION United States Legal Document ≠ All citizens and residents are hereby advised that this is a legally binding document duly incorporated by reference and that failure to comply with such requireme

DocID: 1vaXA - View Document

Recruiting Hispanics – Why not? A Dialogue on Federal Public Service Presented by the League of United Latin American Citizens Washington, D.C.

DocID: 1ulap - View Document

League of United Latin American Citizens Council Meeting Handbook

DocID: 1u3Rm - View Document

Objectives & Purpose: Students will learn about the responsibility of citizens to participate in government. Students will be able to illustrate the structure and function of government as established in the United State

DocID: 1u0sL - View Document