Letter to the Editor Re: When Science and the Law Collide: The Legal Implications of Changed Expert Opinions. J. For. Ident. 2013, The article “When Science and the Law Collide” brought up an interesting issu

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-08-31 14:54:12 Forensic science Opinion Testimony Evidence Daubert standard Opinion evidence Evidence law Law Expert witness		Letter to the Editor Re: When Science and the Law Collide: The Legal Implications of Changed Expert Opinions. J. For. Ident. 2013, The article “When Science and the Law Collide” brought up an interesting issu Add to Reading List Source URL: fprints.nwlean.net Download Document from Source Website File Size: 206,63 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Mednick v. Precor Inc Doc. 125 Case: 1:14-cvDocument #: 125 Filed: Page 1 of 23 PageID #:2864 DocID: 1raH4 - View Document
	Jamison et al v. Depositors Insurance Company Doc. 156 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DocID: 1qFIP - View Document
	The Paradox Of Proof And Scientific Expertise DocID: 1qwG0 - View Document
	Robust Trust in Expert Testimony DocID: 1qugj - View Document
	BOOKS OCTOBER 15, 2007 VOLUME 85, NUMBER 42 PPWeighing Toxic Torts Book outlines the gulf between science and the law Reviewed by Bette Hileman DocID: 1q6Fz - View Document