Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Standardized test / Merit pay / Evaluation / Linda Darling-Hammond / Australian Education Union / Educational assessment / Classroom walkthrough / Education / Year of birth missing / Evaluation methods


DEECD Draft Performance and Development Guidelines AEU RESPONSE Introduction The AEU has structured its response to the DEECD Draft Performance and Development Guidelines for teachers and principals in three parts.
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-11-17 01:01:45


Open Document

File Size: 350,42 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Nashville / Alexandria / Washington / /

Company

The New York Times / /

Country

United States / /

Currency

USD / /

Facility

Grattan Institute / Institute of Education Science / /

IndustryTerm

data-driven accountability systems / substantive teacher evaluation systems / education systems / evaluation systems / on-the-job evaluation tools / teacher evaluation systems / school systems / review systems / energy / /

Organization

Brookings Institution / Center on Education Policy / Grattan Institute / US Department of Education / American Educational Research Association / National Academy of Education / /

Person

Ronald H Heck / Philip Hallinger / Linda Darling-Hammond / Andy Hargreaves / Feedback Principals / Ben Jensen / Joseph Murphy / Edward H. Haertel / Audrey Amrein-Beardsley / Domain / Jesse Rothstein / Lawrence Ingvarson / /

Position

economist / teacher / Measuring Teacher / principal/teacher / managing teacher / individual teacher / Director of the Brown / Teacher Evaluations / Draft Teacher / major teacher / Getting Teacher / Teacher Evaluation Teacher / school leader / leading teacher / Educational Researcher / /

ProgrammingLanguage

J / R / /

PublishedMedium

The New York Times / /

Technology

technology of education / /

URL

http /

SocialTag