COMMENTARY Protecting Special Interests in the Name of “Good Science” Linda Rosenstock, MD, MPH

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-04-22 16:05:47 Data Quality Act Atrazine National Institutes of Health Scientific Integrity in Policymaking United States Environmental Protection Agency Food and Drug Administration Peer review Passive smoking Herbicide Science Medicine Health		COMMENTARY Protecting Special Interests in the Name of “Good Science” Linda Rosenstock, MD, MPH Add to Reading List Source URL: www.thecre.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 66,74 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Statement of Peer review In submitting conference proceedings to Web of Conferences, the editors of the proceedings certify to the Publisher that 1. They adhere to its Policy on Publishing Integrity in order to safeguard DocID: 1vpo4 - View Document
	Sosiologisk årbokAnonym kritikk: Peer Review∗ satt på prøve av vitenskaps-teori og forskning1 Gerhard Fröhlich DocID: 1vn4A - View Document
	Drug Ratings: DOCTORS SAY PEER RATINGS CHANGE THEIR PERCEPTION OF DRUGS In May 2017, the leading global social network for doctors launched SERMO Drug Ratings – the first and only global peer-to-peer drug review system DocID: 1vjj3 - View Document
	Office of Human Rights Peer-to-Peer Reportable IncidentsAs you have heard the Office of Human Rights is conducting a retrospective review of closed ID/DD abuse/neglect investigations from state fiscal year 201 DocID: 1vipZ - View Document
	3a. Peer review instructions Eng Dec 2017 DocID: 1vgkw - View Document