Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Intellectual property law / Law / Linux / Marketing / Proprietary software / Microsoft v. Lindows / Criticism of Microsoft / Trademark distinctiveness / Microsoft Windows / Brand management / Product management / Linspire


Document Date: 2014-06-16 13:27:54

Open Document

File Size: 186,54 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

New York / Washington / London / /

Company

Lindows Inc. / Lindows.com Inc. / Its Brand Name M icrosoft Corp. / ALM Media Properties LLC / Xerox / Microsoft Corp. / Shriver & Jacobson LLP / /

Country

France / United States / Canada / Spain / /

Currency

USD / /

/

Event

Product Release / Legal Issues / IPO / /

Facility

U.S. District Court / /

IndustryTerm

Internet domain names / software maker / particular product / free open-source software / software product / retail computer store / software / software applications / computer products / computer operating system products / /

OperatingSystem

Linux / Linspire / Windows 1.0 / Microsoft Windows / /

Organization

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office / U.S. Court of Appeals / U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington / Securities and Exchange Commission / /

Person

John C. Coughenour / DANIEL GLAZER / Todd Bishop / /

/

Position

spokeswoman / Chief Judge / examining attorney / judge / /

Product

Windows computer operating system products / Jeep / Windows / Windows 1.0 software product / Lindows OS computer operating system / Windows 1.0 / Lindows OS / /

PublishedMedium

Seattle Post-Intelligencer / the NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL / /

Technology

Linux / operating system / operating systems / /

SocialTag