<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Materialism / Physicalism / Ontology / Metaphysics / Concept / Consciousness / Type physicalism / Mind / Cognitive science / Philosophy of mind
Date: 2012-01-09 02:03:42
Materialism
Physicalism
Ontology
Metaphysics
Concept
Consciousness
Type physicalism
Mind
Cognitive science
Philosophy of mind

Philip Goff University of Liverpool/ANU There is no even vaguely plausible physicalist theory of phenomenal concepts There is a sense in which the scientific revolution began when Descartes offered an entirely mathemati

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.humanities.uwa.edu.au

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 22,50 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

What’s Wrong with Strong Necessities? Philip Goff and David Papineau 1 The Significance of Strong Necessities 1.1 Conceivability and PossibilityDavid Chalmers’ challenge to physicalism has dominated the philosophy of

What’s Wrong with Strong Necessities? Philip Goff and David Papineau 1 The Significance of Strong Necessities 1.1 Conceivability and PossibilityDavid Chalmers’ challenge to physicalism has dominated the philosophy of

DocID: 1viEA - View Document

The Cartesian argument against physicalism Philip Goff I’m an analytic metaphysician who thinks analytic metaphysicians don’t think enough about consciousness. By consciousness I mean the property of being a thing su

The Cartesian argument against physicalism Philip Goff I’m an analytic metaphysician who thinks analytic metaphysicians don’t think enough about consciousness. By consciousness I mean the property of being a thing su

DocID: 1uPMG - View Document

Paul Løvland  Physicalism Begs the Question and Violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics Physicalism is critically assessed from a natural scientific viewpoint, and its basic

Paul Løvland Physicalism Begs the Question and Violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics Physicalism is critically assessed from a natural scientific viewpoint, and its basic

DocID: 1uP2T - View Document

A note on the completeness of ‘physics’ David Spurrett & David Papineau 1. One argument for physicalism states that all physical effects are due to physical causes, and hence that anything having physical effects mus

A note on the completeness of ‘physics’ David Spurrett & David Papineau 1. One argument for physicalism states that all physical effects are due to physical causes, and hence that anything having physical effects mus

DocID: 1uCc7 - View Document

After Physicalism edited by BENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE

After Physicalism edited by BENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE

DocID: 1uxCS - View Document