logical verificationexercises 2 Exercise 1. This exercise is concerned with dependent types. We use the following definition in Coq: Inductive natlist_dep : nat -> Set := | nil_dep : natlist_dep 0 - Marc Shell - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2011-09-02 08:06:23 Logic Mathematical logic Mathematics Type theory Propositional calculus Syntax Predicate logic CurryHoward correspondence Dependent type Lambda calculus First-order logic Proposition		logical verificationexercises 2 Exercise 1. This exercise is concerned with dependent types. We use the following definition in Coq: Inductive natlist_dep : nat -> Set := \| nil_dep : natlist_dep 0 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.cs.ru.nl Download Document from Source Website File Size: 62,96 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Proc. Int. Cong. of Math. – 2018 Rio de Janeiro, Vol–1472) HITCHIN TYPE MODULI STACKS IN AUTOMORPHIC REPRESENTATION THEORY Zhiwei Yun (恽之玮) DocID: 1xVTT - View Document
	An adequacy theorem for partial type theory j.w.w. Simon Huber G¨ oteborg, May 11, 2017 An adequacy theorem for partial type theory DocID: 1v8ox - View Document
	E6(6) Exceptional Field Theory: Applications to Type IIB Supergravity on AdS5 ×S5 Arnaud Baguet ´ Ecole Normale Sup´ DocID: 1v5Rr - View Document
	Univalent Type Theory Thierry Coquand Tutorial for the Logic Colloquium 2016, Leeds Univalent Type Theory DocID: 1uZ9e - View Document
	Collection Principles in Dependent Type Theory? Peter Aczel1 and Nicola Gambino2 1 Departments of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Manchester, DocID: 1uXqs - View Document