International Energy Agency / Unspecified Unspecified Additionality EIA / Ag Soil Sequestration 800 Forest Management Ag / U.S. Administration / MtCO2e 700 Afforestation 600 Ag / /
Continent
America / /
Country
Netherlands / United States / /
Event
Environmental Issue / /
Facility
Greenhouse Gas Emissions And Sinks / Energy Research Centre / landfill/coal mine / World Resources Institute / Oregon State University / Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential / Stockholm Environmental Institute / Greenhouse Gas Reductions / /
IndustryTerm
excluded oil / natural gas sectors / natural gas / renewable energy / oil / applied energy technology market penetration curve / forest management / gas and oil‐sector / reversal risk management / gas offsets / banking / higher energy / natural gas sector methane / /
MusicGroup
B.C. / /
Organization
U.S. Department of Energy / United Nations Climate Change Secretariat / Center for European Economic Research / National Association of Manufacturers / MIT / Oregon State University / Unspecified Nicholas Institute / Alexia Kelly World Resources Institute / Nicholas Institute / Recent U.S. Cap‐And‐Trade Modeling Analyses Institution / World Resources Institute / Congressional Budget Office / EIA / Energy Information Administration / Clean Air Task Force / Congress / World Bank / Energy Research Centre / Texas A&M / Congressional Research Service / Michael Lazarus Stockholm Environment Institute / Stockholm Environmental Institute / REFERENCES American Council for Capital Formation / Environmental Protection Agency / /
Person
Bruce McCarl / Brian / Alexia Kelly / Bill Analyzed / Darrius Adams / Anne E. Smith / Sergey Paltsev / W. David / Ronald G. Prinn / Peter Erickson / Marcus Sarofim / Lieberman / Steven Rose / Larry Yacobucci / John / Murray / Anne Smith / Brent Yacobucci / Martin Ross / Parker / /
HOW REALISTIC ARE EXPECTATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GREENHOUSE GAS OFFSETS IN US CLIMATE POLICY