First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
Date: 2006-07-22 20:54:14United States v. Booker United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Blakely v. Washington Apprendi v. New Jersey Marvin E. Frankel Mandatory sentencing Mistretta v. United States United States Sentencing Commission Ring v. Arizona United States criminal procedure Law Criminal procedure | Microsoft Word - _1_Thompson.docAdd to Reading ListSource URL: www.houstonlawreview.orgDownload Document from Source WebsiteFile Size: 101,93 KBShare Document on Facebook |
RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document | |
Case: Document: Page: 1DocID: 1pL6K - View Document | |
JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as theDocID: 1os0A - View Document | |
Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNWDocID: 1my60 - View Document | |
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISHDocID: 1ll9b - View Document |