No[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MARVIN PEUGH, Petitioner,

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-01-26 07:26:52 Rita v. United States United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines United States v. Booker Kimbrough v. United States United States Sentencing Commission Gall v. United States Stinson v. United States Cunningham v. California United States criminal procedure Case law Criminal procedure		No[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MARVIN PEUGH, Petitioner, Add to Reading List Source URL: www.americanbar.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 492,84 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Case: Document: Page: 1 DocID: 1pL6K - View Document
	Testimony of Marc Mauer Executive Director The Sentencing Project Prepared for the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security DocID: 1oNDH - View Document
	Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW DocID: 1my60 - View Document
	BENEFIT & COST SAVINGS: THE SMARTER SENTENCING ACT of 2015 H.RLabrador-Scott) – SLee-Durbin) The bipartisan Smarter Sentencing Act has numerous benefits for taxpayers: it would increase fairness in the cr DocID: 1ayOi - View Document
	SMARTER SENTENCING ACT (Senate March 17, Page: S1576] ‐‐‐ Mr. LEE. Madam President, we rise today to speak in favor of the Smarter Sentencing Act, a bipartisan piece DocID: 1arBG - View Document