Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Male reproductive system / Reproductive system / Human reproduction / Sexual effects of circumcision / Foreskin / Glans penis / Ridged band / Masturbation / Medicine / Penis / Circumcision


OP9-7: Tina Kimmel, PhD, MSW, MPH (Berkeley, CA), John W. Travis, MD, MPH (Mullumbimby, NSW, Australia), and Hugh Young, BSc (Porirua, New Zealand) REFUTING MASTERS AND JOHNSON’S CLAIM THAT CIRCUMCISION HAS NO EFFECT ON SENSITIVITY
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2007-04-27 06:08:15

Open Document

File Size: 3,14 MB

Share Result on Facebook

City

San Francisco / London / /

Country

United States / Australia / New Zealand / /

Facility

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine / /

MedicalCondition

hypertension / circumcision scar / ventral scar / erectile dysfunction / diabetes / penile and sexual dysfunction / HIV/AIDS / impotence / /

MedicalTreatment

male circumcision / surgery / circumcision / /

Organization

Department of Paediatrics and Human Development / †National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers / American Academy of Pediatrics / Michigan State University College of Human Medicine / /

Person

Robert S. Van Howe‡ Retired / Virginia E. Johnson / Norma Wilcox / John W. Travis / Marilyn F. Milos / James L. Snyder / William H. Masters / Morris L. Sorrells / Hugh Young / Mark D. Reiss / Christopher Eden / Tina Kimmel / /

Position

*HIV/AIDS researcher / /

ProvinceOrState

California / /

URL

www.aap.org/policy / /

SocialTag