San Francisco / Philadelphia / Wanke / Baltimore / Canberra / Calgary / London / /
Company
Open University Press / Bridgman SA / Adelaide SA / Modern Health Care Systems New York / Donaldson / Case Study 1 Assisted Reproductive Technologies / Assisted Reproductive Technologies / Elshaug AG / Miles and co / Francis Group / Pearson / Creative Commons / BioMed Central Ltd. / /
Country
Canada / Australia / United Kingdom / New Zealand / United States / / /
Event
FDA Phase / Product Issues / Product Recall / /
Facility
Australian Institute / Institute of Medical / UK's National Institute / Hospital Harmful / National Institute of Clinical Studies / The University of Adelaide / Australia's National Institute of Clinical Studies / Australian clinic / University of Adelaide / 2Hanson Institute / Temple Smith / /
IndustryTerm
health services / health care services / otherwise effective technologies / health technology uptake / health technologies / technology assessment / medical technology / practice/technology / health technology assessment consultancy groups / health technology assessment skills / pharmaceuticals / social systems / mental health services / ineffective technologies / reproduction technology / health insurance industry / health technology assessments / obsolete technology / medical technologies / particular services / health technology assessment groups conduct / health care technologies / decision support tools / healthcare / public health services / mixed-model health care systems / health care systems / /
MedicalCondition
JE / chronic health conditions / Obstructive Sleep Apnea / Medical vs social infertility / sleep apnea / adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea / /
MedicalTreatment
surgery / /
Organization
University of Adelaide / Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee / Center for Medical Technology Policy in San Francisco / Australian Commission on Safety and Quality / Australian Government / Medicare / Center For Comparative Effectiveness Information / Australian Institute for Health and Welfare / vs / Australian Council for Safety and Quality / Department of Health / NHS / UK's National Institute for Clinical Excellence / Victorian Government Department of Human Services / National Health and Medical Research Council / Tunis SR / Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science / 2Hanson Institute / Australasian Association for Quality / Center for Comparative Effectiveness / Statistics Unit / Faculty of Health Sciences / Australian Medicare / Intensive Care Unit / Medical Services Advisory Committee / National Institute of Clinical Studies / National Institute for Clinical Excellence / /
Person
Janet E Hiller / Adam G Elshaug / Adam Elshaug / John R Moss / Sean R Tunis / Paul Nurse / / /
Position
Prime Minister / Chief Executive Officer / Calverley PM / director of Adelaide Health Technology Assessment / Professor / Minister / advisors / consultant / scientist / Corresponding author / Governor / Director / Nurse / Marshall / /
Product
reimbursement / Hiller1 / /
ProgrammingLanguage
RC / /
ProvinceOrState
Alberta / /
PublishedMedium
The Cochrane review / /
RadioStation
Southcott AM / /
Technology
reproduction technology / health technologies / potentially obsolete technology / Health Technology / adam / relatively ineffective technologies / laser / also existing health care technologies / /
Australia and New Zealand Health Policy BioMed Central Open Access