Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2006-12-12 18:04:08 Academic publishing Scientific method Publishing Knowledge Science Scholarly peer review Blinded experiment Academic journal Bias Richard T. Snodgrass Scientific journal		Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In Add to Reading List Source URL: history.acm.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 256,50 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In DocID: 1xTrh - View Document
	Transitioning Temporal Support in TSQL2 to SQL3 Richard T. Snodgrass 1, Michael H. BShlen 2, Christian S. Jensen 2, and Andreas Steiner 3 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona, Thcson, AZ 85721, USA, rt DocID: 1n6tP - View Document
	Status of ACM Transactions on Database Systems Richard T. Snodgrass June 7, 2004 This document outlines my view of the current state of ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), summarizes my experience to date with t DocID: 1gPgb - View Document
	A Vision for the ACM Transactions on Database Systems Richard T. Snodgrass January 29, 2001 This document outlines my view of the current state of ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), summarizes my experience to DocID: 1gOUe - View Document
	TPC-BiH: A Benchmark for Bitemporal Databases Martin Kaufmann, Peter M. Fischer, Norman May, Donald Kossmann August 26th, 2013 DocID: 19YwJ - View Document