<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Philosophy / Education / Academia / Democracy / Philosophy of science / American philosophers / Direct democracy / Charles Sanders Peirce / John Dewey / Pragmatism / Inquiry / E-democracy
Date: 2011-02-01 22:30:01
Philosophy
Education
Academia
Democracy
Philosophy of science
American philosophers
Direct democracy
Charles Sanders Peirce
John Dewey
Pragmatism
Inquiry
E-democracy

2011 SAAP Paper Submission: Changing the Narrative:

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.american-philosophy.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 61,50 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Pragmatism. Propositional Priority and the Organic Model of Propositional Individuation María J. Frápolli University College London Neftalí Villanueva

Pragmatism. Propositional Priority and the Organic Model of Propositional Individuation María J. Frápolli University College London Neftalí Villanueva

DocID: 1vbgg - View Document

1.  PRAGMATISM, EUROSCEPTICISM AND INTEGRATION: A DYNAMIC APPROACH  PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE

1. PRAGMATISM, EUROSCEPTICISM AND INTEGRATION: A DYNAMIC APPROACH PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE

DocID: 1uDUa - View Document

Pragmatism, Belief, and Reduction: Stereoformulas and Atomic Models in Early Stereochemistry

Pragmatism, Belief, and Reduction: Stereoformulas and Atomic Models in Early Stereochemistry

DocID: 1uohz - View Document

EPISTEMIC PRAGMATISM: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST MODERATION Juan Comesaña Abstract: By “epistemic pragmatism” in general I will understand the claim that whether propositions instantiate

EPISTEMIC PRAGMATISM: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST MODERATION Juan Comesaña Abstract: By “epistemic pragmatism” in general I will understand the claim that whether propositions instantiate

DocID: 1umIo - View Document

Pragmatism and Inferentialism∗ John MacFarlane† January 9, 2009 One of the central themes of Brandom’s work is that we should construct our sematic theories around material validity and incompatibility, rather than

Pragmatism and Inferentialism∗ John MacFarlane† January 9, 2009 One of the central themes of Brandom’s work is that we should construct our sematic theories around material validity and incompatibility, rather than

DocID: 1ufHB - View Document